Suzanne Angly, Miss France 1969, posing in a bathing suit. The three applicants involved in the lawsuit against Miss France were rejected from the competition for their “age, height, drinking and smoking in public and having tattoos,” Ahrabare told CNN. “The competition rules are discriminatory: marital status, age, attitudes, choices of women, everything is subject to injunctions from another time! Candidates must be single and respect the rules of “elegance”, stop these sexist rules!” she added. Miss France and Endemol Productions have not responded to CNN’s request for comment.Īlyssa Ahrabare, the head of Osez le féminisme, wrote on social media that Miss France currently “feeds stereotypes that stand in the way of equality.” “It is high time Endemol Production finally removes all sexist clauses from its regulations.” “Beyond exploiting women for economic gain, this contest, through the violations of the law of which it is guilty, has a negative and retrograde impact on the whole of society,” wrote Osez le féminisme in its news statement. While the mission statement of the competition is to find “the young woman most representative of beauty and elegance,” the strict registration requirements mean contenders for the crown are somewhat limited. Failing to comply could land the contestant with a 5,000-euro ($5,822) fine, according to Miss France’s terms and conditions. The application also asks for clothing size, and it requests that prospective beauty queens do not undergo any major physical changes after they are accepted into the competition. Christophe Simon/AFP/Getty Imagesįurther disqualifiers for potential contestants include wearing weaves or hair extensions, having tattoos and smoking. Once posted you lose any reasonable expectation of privacy, so, as this is an open forum (with no privilege attached), please be extra careful when considering what to post online (forewarned is forearmed.Miss Guadeloupe Clemence Botino is crowned Miss France 2020. It is essentially an admission / confession and can be introduced into evidence as a statement against your interest in a subsequent legal proceeding.
Fourth: Anything that you post on Avvo (or on similar sites) or on any social media is by its nature public. I hope that I have been helpful in answering your question.įirst, second and third: No attorney-client relationship exists by virtue of any Q&A with Michael A. If I were you I would A) NOT (caps intentional) return to that site and B) consider reporting it to local law enforcement.
On the other hand, if you uploaded or downloaded or spent any appreciable amount of time onsite, well. If you neither uploaded nor download anything, and if you did not spend any appreciable amount of time onsite then you are likely not going to be targeted.
0 kommentar(er)
